Trainees lose track of abstract deadlines and miss submitting work they have already done. Existing listings organise by event date, span the whole world, and say nothing about whether your audit is eligible. This site is organised around a different question: what is closing soon that my project qualifies for?
Listings come from a maintained list of trusted organisers — colleges, faculties, training bodies and specialty societies. Their own pages are checked a few times a week, and when a page changes the new details are extracted and checked before anything is published.
We do not crawl the open web looking for conferences. That is a deliberate choice: it is how predatory meetings end up on aggregator sites, and a listing you cannot trust is worse than no listing.
Every deadline must be traceable to the exact sentence it came from. On any conference page you can open “where this date comes from”and read the verbatim text from the organiser's site. If a date cannot be quoted, it is not recorded.
Each listing also carries a badge saying how it was checked:
A wrong deadline is worse than a missing conference, so anything ambiguous waits for a human rather than being guessed at. Nothing here replaces checking the official website before you submit.
Please tell us. Every conference page has a Report an issuelink that takes one sentence and no account. Corrections are the main way errors get caught, and a confirmed report also makes us trust that organiser's page less until it proves itself again.
Free for doctors, with no account needed to browse. AbstractsDue is independent and not affiliated with any listed organiser. Should it ever carry sponsorship, that will never affect which conferences are listed or the order they appear in, and anything sponsored will say so plainly.